Published finding · Bugcrowd

Skyscanner A finding accepted against *.skyscanner.net. Bugcrowd published no award figure for it.

critical resolved

01 · The record

Everything Bugcrowd published about this

Programme: Skyscanner In our directory, so it has reviews and a grade.
Platform handle: skyscanner
Asset: *.skyscanner.net The specific asset the finding landed against, as the platform named it.
Severity: critical Bugcrowd rates P1–P5; this is that rating in HackerOne's words so the two feeds can sit in one table.
Award: Not published This does not mean nothing was paid. Both platforms let a programme accept a finding without publishing the figure, and most do.
Found by: Withheld The platform did not publish a name. We store that as withheld and never guess.
State: resolved — the programme has fixed it
Accepted: 9 June 2026 4 months ago. This is the date the programme accepted the finding.
First seen here: 12 September 2026 When our sweep first read this entry. It says nothing about the finding, only about us.
Platform reference: 6dae583a-32a3-4aa3-bf60-1b6afb0af041

View the programme on Bugcrowd ↗ Bugcrowd publishes the acceptance, not the submission. There is no public write-up for this finding anywhere, and no page for the entry itself, so this link goes to the programme. Everything Bugcrowd did publish about it is already above.

03 · The programme

What else Skyscanner has published

*.skyscanner.net none · resolved · withheld · 2 months ago —
Skyscanner iOS app low · resolved · muhammad_shoaib_anwar · 3 months ago $100
*.skyscanner.net medium · resolved · Excal1bur · 4 months ago —
*.skyscanner.net critical · resolved · HackerRexx · 4 months ago $3,000
*.skyscanner.net low · unresolved · withheld · 4 months ago —
*.skyscanner.net high · resolved · 9fa1 · 5 months ago $2,000

See Skyscanner's grade and researcher reviews →

Where this came from. One row of a public platform feed, stored as published and never edited. We hold no report title, no write-up and no reproduction steps, because the feeds do not carry them and we do not go looking for them. A withheld name stays withheld; if a finder later asks the platform to un-name them, the next sweep un-names them here. Absence of an award figure is publication policy, not evidence a programme did not pay.