BugRater
Early access: this site has moved to bugrater.com.
← The brief
Published finding · Bugcrowd

SecureDrop A finding accepted against https://github.com/freedomofpress/securedrop. Bugcrowd published no award figure for it.

low unresolved
01 · The record

Everything Bugcrowd published about this

Programme
SecureDrop In our directory, so it has reviews and a grade.
Platform handle
freedomofpress
Asset
https://github.com/freedomofpress/securedrop The specific asset the finding landed against, as the platform named it.
Severity
low Bugcrowd rates P1–P5; this is that rating in HackerOne's words so the two feeds can sit in one table.
Award
Not published This does not mean nothing was paid. Both platforms let a programme accept a finding without publishing the figure, and most do.
Found by
iamdennisstevens Named because the finder allowed the platform to name them.
State
unresolved — accepted, not yet fixed
Accepted
31 August 2026 24 days ago. This is the date the programme accepted the finding.
First seen here
1 September 2026 When our sweep first read this entry. It says nothing about the finding, only about us.
Platform reference
a44a6b35-35f6-4022-8afa-2befab2b0dc6
View the programme on Bugcrowd ↗ Bugcrowd publishes the acceptance, not the submission. There is no public write-up for this finding anywhere, and no page for the entry itself, so this link goes to the programme. Everything Bugcrowd did publish about it is already above.
03 · The finder

The only finding we hold from iamdennisstevens

This is the only published finding we hold from iamdennisstevens on Bugcrowd. That is a statement about our coverage, not about their record: we read a few pages of each feed per sweep, and most accepted work is never published at all.

Counted within Bugcrowd only. The same handle on another platform may or may not be the same person, and this page will not assume it is.

04 · The programme

What else SecureDrop has published

See SecureDrop's grade and researcher reviews →

Where this came from. One row of a public platform feed, stored as published and never edited. We hold no report title, no write-up and no reproduction steps, because the feeds do not carry them and we do not go looking for them. A withheld name stays withheld; if a finder later asks the platform to un-name them, the next sweep un-names them here. Absence of an award figure is publication policy, not evidence a programme did not pay.