Glean Technologies Public Engagement A finding this programme accepted and published. Bugcrowd published no award figure for it.
Everything Bugcrowd published about this
- Programme
- Glean Technologies Public Engagement In our directory, so it has reviews and a grade.
- Platform handle
- glean-technologies-public
- Asset
- Not published The platform did not name an asset for this entry.
- Severity
- high Bugcrowd rates P1–P5; this is that rating in HackerOne's words so the two feeds can sit in one table.
- Award
- Not published This does not mean nothing was paid. Both platforms let a programme accept a finding without publishing the figure, and most do.
- Found by
- moroq Named because the finder allowed the platform to name them.
- State
- resolved — the programme has fixed it
- Accepted
- 16 February 2026 7 months ago. This is the date the programme accepted the finding.
- First seen here
- 16 August 2026 When our sweep first read this entry. It says nothing about the finding, only about us.
- Platform reference
- 5fab2867-b605-4be8-91d3-f534f6f9341a
The only finding we hold from moroq
This is the only published finding we hold from moroq on Bugcrowd. That is a statement about our coverage, not about their record: we read a few pages of each feed per sweep, and most accepted work is never published at all.
Counted within Bugcrowd only. The same handle on another platform may or may not be the same person, and this page will not assume it is.
What else Glean Technologies Public Engagement has published
- Finding accepted low · unresolved · EmperorEye · 1 month ago —
- Finding accepted high · resolved · rcss · 3 months ago $2,500
- Finding accepted low · resolved · withheld · 4 months ago —
- Backend endpoint: bug-bounty-be.glean.com medium · resolved · Albator91 · 5 months ago —
- Finding accepted low · resolved · withheld · 7 months ago —
See Glean Technologies Public Engagement's grade and researcher reviews →
Where this came from. One row of a public platform feed, stored as published and never edited. We hold no report title, no write-up and no reproduction steps, because the feeds do not carry them and we do not go looking for them. A withheld name stays withheld; if a finder later asks the platform to un-name them, the next sweep un-names them here. Absence of an award figure is publication policy, not evidence a programme did not pay.