Published finding · Bugcrowd

$1,500 awarded on Lime, against web-production.lime.bike.

medium paid unresolved

01 · The record

Everything Bugcrowd published about this

Programme: Lime In our directory, so it has reviews and a grade.
Platform handle: lime
Asset: web-production.lime.bike The specific asset the finding landed against, as the platform named it.
Severity: medium Bugcrowd rates P1–P5; this is that rating in HackerOne's words so the two feeds can sit in one table.
Award: $1,500 What the platform printed. Where a report carried more than one payment they are summed.
Found by: 0x4sTr4ck Named because the finder allowed the platform to name them.
State: unresolved — accepted, not yet fixed
Accepted: 31 July 2026 2 months ago. This is the date the programme accepted the finding.
First seen here: 16 August 2026 When our sweep first read this entry. It says nothing about the finding, only about us.
Platform reference: fad1c8a4-2db3-4130-b2d9-d8a8b4189564

View the programme on Bugcrowd ↗ Bugcrowd publishes the acceptance, not the submission. There is no public write-up for this finding anywhere, and no page for the entry itself, so this link goes to the programme. Everything Bugcrowd did publish about it is already above.

02 · Is this figure normal

Where this award sits

A single large number tells you nothing on its own. What matters is whether this programme pays like this routinely or whether this was the one time it did.

#2 of 5 here

$800 this programme's median

$4,000 its largest published

#299 of 1,433 awards we hold

It is the 2nd largest of 5 awards this programme has published. At 1.9× the median, it is well above what this programme normally prints.

Every figure here is drawn only from awards a platform chose to publish, which is a minority of what gets paid. Read the median as "of the payouts made public", never as "what this programme pays".

03 · The finder

The only finding we hold from 0x4sTr4ck

This is the only published finding we hold from 0x4sTr4ck on Bugcrowd. That is a statement about our coverage, not about their record: we read a few pages of each feed per sweep, and most accepted work is never published at all.

Counted within Bugcrowd only. The same handle on another platform may or may not be the same person, and this page will not assume it is.

04 · The programme

What else Lime has published

Lime website critical · unresolved · sealldeveloper · 3 months ago $4,000
Finding accepted medium · unresolved · dphoeniixx · 3 months ago $800
Data portal medium · unresolved · fishjojo1 · 4 months ago $800
web-production.lime.bike medium · unresolved · withheld · 4 months ago —
web-production.lime.bike medium · unresolved · withheld · 4 months ago —
Rider Android low · unresolved · withheld · 4 months ago —
admintool.lime.bike medium · unresolved · loacker · 4 months ago $800
Finding accepted medium · resolved · withheld · 4 months ago —

See Lime's grade and researcher reviews →

Where this came from. One row of a public platform feed, stored as published and never edited. We hold no report title, no write-up and no reproduction steps, because the feeds do not carry them and we do not go looking for them. A withheld name stays withheld; if a finder later asks the platform to un-name them, the next sweep un-names them here. Absence of an award figure is publication policy, not evidence a programme did not pay.