Published finding · Bugcrowd

Viator A finding accepted against *.viator.com. Bugcrowd published no award figure for it.

high unresolved

01 · The record

Everything Bugcrowd published about this

Programme: Viator In our directory, so it has reviews and a grade.
Platform handle: viator
Asset: *.viator.com The specific asset the finding landed against, as the platform named it.
Severity: high Bugcrowd rates P1–P5; this is that rating in HackerOne's words so the two feeds can sit in one table.
Award: Not published This does not mean nothing was paid. Both platforms let a programme accept a finding without publishing the figure, and most do.
Found by: Withheld The platform did not publish a name. We store that as withheld and never guess.
State: unresolved — accepted, not yet fixed
Accepted: 24 September 2026 yesterday. This is the date the programme accepted the finding.
First seen here: 24 September 2026 When our sweep first read this entry. It says nothing about the finding, only about us.
Platform reference: 1abb7b94-17c4-41cd-a69c-472d3f44d936

View the programme on Bugcrowd ↗ Bugcrowd publishes the acceptance, not the submission. There is no public write-up for this finding anywhere, and no page for the entry itself, so this link goes to the programme. Everything Bugcrowd did publish about it is already above.

03 · The programme

What else Viator has published

*.viator.com low · resolved · DarkExpl0it · 21 days ago —
Android Viator Tours & Activities App low · resolved · withheld · 29 days ago —
*.viator.com low · unresolved · Alhasan_Abbas · 29 days ago —
https://supplier.viator.com/ high · resolved · ACH21 · 2 months ago $2,150
*.viatorinc.com medium · unresolved · withheld · 2 months ago —
https://supplier.viator.com/ medium · resolved · marius_dp · 3 months ago $850
*.viator.com low · resolved · LOSThacker · 3 months ago $200
*.viator.com low · unresolved · withheld · 3 months ago —

See Viator's grade and researcher reviews →

Where this came from. One row of a public platform feed, stored as published and never edited. We hold no report title, no write-up and no reproduction steps, because the feeds do not carry them and we do not go looking for them. A withheld name stays withheld; if a finder later asks the platform to un-name them, the next sweep un-names them here. Absence of an award figure is publication policy, not evidence a programme did not pay.